Category: Book Reviews

TBR 10 Yr – You Before Me – Jojo Moyes

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 20231 Comment

Genre: Chick lit, romance, disability

Narrative Style: First person from a number of different people, chronological

Rating: 2/5

Published: 2012

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: Louisa Clark is in need of a new job. The job centre sends her to be carer to quadriplegic, Will Traynor. Will is rude and miserable and at first refuses to acknowledge Louisa. She hates it but perseveres and soon, Will’s happiness begins to mean a lot to her. Then she discovers that Will has given his parents six months before he goes to Dignitas and ends his life and she tries many schemes to make him change his mind.

Reading Challenges: TBR 10 Yr Challenge hosted by Roof Beam Reader

Time on shelf: I bought this when the film came out. It was 99p on Kindle so I bought it but very quickly I decided I probably wouldn’t like it so it sat on the shelf.

I don’t know why I do it to myself. Whenever there is a book that is really popular and I decide to read it, I always hate it. (Where the Crawdads Sing, The Thursday Murder Club, The Time Traveller’s Wife to name but three.) I put off reading this for that very reason, not to mention that when the film came out, disability activists were up in arms. I wasn’t sure I wanted to ever read it. Putting it on this list meant that I had to read it.

It didn’t take long for me to be irritated. The characters were immediately stereotypical. Lou Clark was a quirky, working class heroine. Will was upper class, used to having his own way and sullen because he felt he was no longer in control of his life. I found the stereotyping offensive even without the disability angle. (Salt of the earth, working class heroine reminds buttoned up upper class hero what it means to love. How tedious.) Lou’s family seem to have stepped out of a dickens novel about poverty – sister Treena is a single mom, dad makes furniture and gets laid off halfway through( but luckily is saved by Will and given a job working for his dad!), mum spends all her time looking after Lou’s grandfather who has had a stroke. They all live in the same house and there is never enough money to go round. All of them seemed like “characters” rather than actual people.

I was also unconvinced by Lou’s relationship with her boyfriend, Patrick – a man obsessed with running and training and eating the right thing. Although Lou says that he was different when they first got together, it was very difficult to see how they had managed to have a relationship last for seven years. I certainly didn’t see why Lou still put up with him. He was unpleasant and only seemed to see a version of Lou that he would prefer – one that would train with him, for example. Lou, then, was ripe for falling in love and Will came into the picture at just the right time.

Of course, at first Will is singularly unpleasant and Lou wants to quit but money troubles mean that she can’t. Slowly, Will becomes more communicative especially after a visit from his ex girlfriend Alicia who is getting married to his best friend Rupert, both of whom are horrible. Then Louisa hears Mrs Traynor and Will’s sister, Georgina, talking about the fact that they had six months to convince Will he wanted to live. If they couldn’t do it, then he would end his life at Dignitas in Switzerland. Lou finds this hard to understand and so she decides that she will try to make the future as exciting as possible for Will as she feels that he should want to live, that she can make things more exciting for him and if she just tries hard enough, he will realise that actually life is good. It seemed obvious to me that Will would not change his mind.

I feel like there is no good way to end this narrative. First of all, there is the way it actually ends. Will, despite the fact that he loves Louisa, still goes to Switzerland. This is what angered the disability rights groups so much. Will has the money to pay for whatever he needs. He could live a reasonable life. He has people who love him. But still, he decides to kill himself. I understand that people could see this as meaning disabled people have no role in society but I do not think that this is what Moyes intended to say. In fact, I think that Will’s decision had more to do with the fact that he is unused to having to take anything into account when he decides to do something. Before his accident, he had money and he travelled extensively. He hiked and climbed mountains. After the accident, he has to think about his disability all the time and if it doesn’t stop him from doing something, it puts huge obstacles in the way. Louisa (and her mother) fail to understand this because they have to think carefully about every decision they make because they have no money and no spare time. Also, everyone, apart from Will, opposes the idea of going to Dignitas There are many moral arguments given against this decision in the novel. If Moyes’ felt that disabled people have no meaning within society, I think she may have chosen to play this a little differently.

So what about a different ending? I feel, although all those readers who say they cried may feel differently, that if Will had changed his mind, it would have been no better. In fact, as I neared the end of the novel, I was unsure what to wish for. I didn’t particularly want Will to kill himself but I was also offended by the idea that the love of a quirky working class girl might be enough to save the day. Neither Louisa nor her mother really think about what Will is going through. They think about the fact that they will miss him and they call him selfish for all the hurt that he will cause but they do not think about what he might feel, when he has yet another bout of pneumonia or when he gets an infection he can’t shake off. It seemed to me that Will wanted to have control over his death, to have a good death and be able to say goodbye to people. A fair enough wish, I would think.

Finally, I found the class politics of this novel annoying. Pre-accident, Will has money, a job in the city and is able to travel all over the world. Lou, by contrast, is working in a café enjoying the eccentricities of the customers. Their paths would not have crossed of not for Will’s accident. That’s one hell of a plot device. And then there is the fact that Will leaves her a lot of money so she can go to university and live a life she would not have managed otherwise. Suitable compensation for not having his company? I certainly didn’t feel it was the romantic ending that everyone else seemed to. Ultimately, she learns to be a better person through her contact with Will and then she gets to live a better life through the money he leaves her. Both of these left a sour taste in my mouth.

TBR Yr 10 – The Feminine Mystique – Betty Friedan

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 20231 Comment

Genre: Feminism, Academic

Narrative Style: Academic

Published: 1963

Rating: 3/5

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: When Friedan does a survey of her old college classmates, she finds most of them are not using their education and she wonders why. She starts to speak to more women and realises that they have put motherhood and having a family first and many of them feel dissatisfied and don’t know why. She calls this ‘the problem with no name’. She comes to realise that the way American society frames femininity has forced women back into the home. These assumptions that women should be fulfilled merely from housework and children, she calls The Feminine Mystique.

Time on shelf: I bought this during lockdown (2020) after watching the TV series Mrs America.

Reading Challenges: TBR Challenge hosted by Adam Burgess at Roof Beam Reader.

I vowed to do more academic reading this year – I used to read a lot of academic works when I was studying for my MPhil and I really enjoyed it but I’ve got out of the habit lately. Friedan seemed a good place to start as she is such an important name from that era of feminism.

Friedan has an straightforward, anecdotal style which helped put across the sometimes complex ideas that she was using to support her idea that American women were pushed into being wives and mothers, rather than focusing on their careers. Even women who had been to college. She then outlined the factors that she feels hold women in this place.

I enjoyed reading this book. The beginning, particularly, still seemed apt today. There are still a lot of girls that can only imagine themselves as wives and mothers, still a lot of advertising that makes it clear that this is women’s role. You certainly never hear boys say that all they want in the world is to be someone’s father.

Friedan uses her own experience – describing how she chose marriage and motherhood over her career in psychology – to show how women felt frightened to wait too long to get married or get too educated. She discusses how men make all the decisions about what read in magazines (all the editors are men), about what advertising is directed at them (all the ad executives are men) and so they feel they have no choice but to become this infantilised version of a woman that these men have created. All of which fits with what I felt I knew of women’s role in the 1950s.

But as I read on, I found it harder and harder to be completely on Friedan’s side. Obviously, I don’t know what it was like to be a fifties housewife, trapped in a marriage, the only outlet for her energies her children but Friedan chooses to use the concentration camps as a metaphor for this which made me feel very uncomfortable. She says ‘In a sense that is not as far-fetched as it sounds, the women who “adjust” as housewives, who grow up wanting to be “just a housewife,” are in as much danger as the millions who walked to their own death in the concentration camps—and the millions more who refused to believe that the concentration camps existed’ and calls it the ‘comfortable concentration camp’ throughout this chapter. This is clearly an exaggeration and feels somewhat self indulgent. It trivialises the holocaust and makes Friedan’s rhetoric a little ridiculous. Friedan has since said that she feels ashamed of making such an analogy but that doesn’t make it any easier to read.

Friedan does a very good job of debunking Freud and his ideas about women which were very popular at the time when Friedan was writing. However, she is unable to escape his influence when she talks about homosexuality which she believes is due to bad mothering that she feels is softening the nation’s men. She calls homosexuality a ‘murky smog’ which is spreading over America. This is downright homophobic. It is obviously difficult to separate a writer from their time and thinking about homosexuality at the time was probably closer to Friedan’s ideas then ours in 2023 and Friedan has acknowledged her error in not supporting LGBT rights. Even so, it would be nice to think that Friedan would see that it was not just women that were harmed by the patriarchal society.

Having said that, Friedan does not acknowledge any women who are not like her – there is nothing of women of colour or working class women here – not even an acknowledgement that things might be different for them. The problem with no name’ is only a problem for those with the money and leisure to be bored. Those who wanted ‘more’ meaning furthering their education or starting a career, would presumably have the money to have a nanny or a maid. She also cannot imagine a woman without a man or a woman without children. This book is a solution to a problem that only a select group of women had.

Finally, as the book carries on, listing one thing after another, it becomes hard to imagine how any woman might break free of it. Indeed, if it so all encompassing that Friedan compares living in a white suburban home to the concentration camps, how has she managed to break free of it in order to point the way to other women? Is she some kind of super woman to have realised what the issue is and pass on her advice to other women who are like her?

Overall, I’m glad to have read this and I see why it was important. but I think I need to follow it up with reading some writing by women from the groups she doesn’t mention, starting with bell hooks From the Margin to the Center.

TBR 10 Yr – The Accidental – Ali Smith

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 20231 Comment

Genre: literary fiction, family, experimental

Narrative style: Stream of consciousness from a number of different viewpoints.

Rating: 3/5

Published: 2005

Format: Paperback

Synopsis: Eve Smart and her family are on holiday in Norfolk when Amber appears at their door. Eve believes she is a student of her womanising husband, Michael. He believes that she has come to interview Eve. Amber is accepted into the family and lies to and manipulates every member of the household.

Time on shelf: Quite a while, I think. I’ve certainly had it as a alternative in earlier versions of this challenge. I have mixed experiences reading Smith and the last one I read – Autumn – left me disappointed so I put off reading this one.

Reading Challenges: TBR Yr 10 Challenge – Hosted by Adam Burgess at Roof Beam Reader.

I enjoyed the start of this book. I liked the different voices. I was interested in the characters and when Amber started to disrupt their lives, I wanted to see what would happen. I thought that there might be some explanation as to Amber’s appearance and was enjoying trying to work out what her relation to the family might be. Somewhere around halfway through, it started to get less enjoyable.

Smith writes in stream of consciousness for each character and it was this that first started to irritate me. The first time we hear Eve’s voice, it is the in the form of questions and answers which mimicked the style of Eve’s fiction which is styled as interviews with characters who died in World War 2. I found it irksome although it was undeniably clever. Later, when Amber has been with the family sometime, Michael, Eve’s husband starts to break down and so does the prose of his section, abandoning the formalities of a novel and becoming poetic, lacking punctuation and showing clearly that Michael is not the creative genius he imagines himself to be. Again, this was a clever way to show Michael’s inner turmoil but I found it irritating and it didn’t do much to further the plot.

In fact, plot seemed a minor consideration here. Amber has no relation to the other characters and no motive for disrupting their lives. She appears and disappears with no explanation. I admit I found this annoying but maybe I’m missing the point. I wanted closure and explanation and it isn’t really Smith’s style to give it. The other characters do change and move forward. Michael is suspended by his university for his behaviour towards his female students and has to take a more fatherly role to his two step children. Eve decides she needs get away from her family and from her writer’s block so she travels to the USA to discover he father’s other family. At the end, she is about to invade a family in the way that Amber invaded hers.

This is a novel about ideas, about boundaries and about the slipperiness of meaning. It’s about how the past affects the present and then the future. She is full of ideas. At the end, the family come home to find their home has been completely stripped of contents even down to the doorknobs. This felt like a step to far, another meaningless event that Smith is not going to explain.

This isn’t a terrible read. It’s better then I’ve made it sound because it is clever and because Smith can definitely turn a phrase but I wasn’t attached to any of the characters and at the end I felt nothing.

TBR Yr 10 5. Black Mischief – Evelyn Waugh

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 2023Leave a comment

Genre: Satire, Classics

Narrative Style: Third person, chronological

Rating: 3/5

Published: 1932

Format: Paperback

Synopsis: Black Mischief is set on the fictional island of Azania and follows new emperor, Seth as he tries to set up his government and modernise the country. He is aided by his Oxford friend, Basil Seal who sees plenty of possibilities in the new country.

Reading challenges: TBR Challenge

Time on shelf: At least 10 years. It was in a boxset of classics that I got for Christmas one year. I put off reading it because might not have stood the test of time. But I have read Waugh before and quite enjoyed it so I thought I’d give it a go.

This was a strange and sometimes uncomfortable read. It is supposed to be satirical. Perhaps it was. It’s hard to know what people might have made of it at the time. To me. it felt muddled, unfunny and, at times, racist. It has certainly been my least favourite Waugh.

Of course, it is hard to judge a man outside of his time and I doubt very much that Waugh was saying things that were very different from what a lot of people thought at the time. It can’t be expected that writers will be able to predict exactly what ideas will change and how. Who knows what future generations will make of what current authors have to say and what ways we will be criticised.

So what was good – well, some of the satire did still stick. The way that Seth favoured everything that was modern regardless of its usefulness was amusing. Like the tank he brought to Azania without thinking of the heat. Like the boots he tries to make his army wear. He is constantly coming up with new and ridiculous ideas. He creates new money that is useless. He has no more idea about the country of Azania than any of the white diplomats. His Oxford education has merely widened the gap between him and his people.

All of the white diplomats and their families were ridiculous and incompetent. They were concerned with their own schemes and their own betterment. They didn’t care about the country and they didn’t care about the people who lived there unless it might affect their comfort and safety. All of which felt like it might be true.

But there were bad things. Waugh has no issue with the N word. He also uses ‘darkie’. One character goes by the name of Black Bitch. There is cannibalism. All of which are bad to our eyes but probably weren’t that outlandish at the time of publication. Without a doubt, though, the worse thing is that Waugh can’t imagine a future of self rule for Africa. Seth is out of touch with his own country, more like the white man than his fellow Africans. When he takes over the country, some of the diplomats plan a coup d’etat. They find Seth’s senile uncle, Achon and reinstall him on the throne (presumably because they will be able to control him). He promptly dies and Seth is killed by one of his ministers. The league of nations has to step in and claim the country. I found this the most difficult thing to deal with. I don’t know how big a feat of imagination it might have been for Waugh to picture an Africa ruled competently by Africans but I found the end of this novel rather depressing.

TBR YR 10 – The Moon is a Harsh Mistress – Robert A. Heinlein

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 2023Leave a comment

Genre: Science fiction, Classics, Politics

Narrative Style: First person, chronological

Rating: 4/5

Published: 1966

Synopsis: The moon (Luna) is a former penal colony for Earth. They provide a lot of grain to Earth and are tied into an almost impossible to escape business structure that keeps Luna inhabitants poor and Earth well fed. The Federated Nations refuse to acknowledge Luna as a real country and release them from servitude. When Mannie Garcia, a computer technician realises that the central computer for Luna is self- aware, he, and his companions Wyoh and The Prof, start to consider the possibilities of rebellion.

Format: Kindle

Time on Shelf: A few years now. I had heard of it and was curious but slightly wary as I hasn’t got on very well with Starship Troopers, the last book I read by Heinlein.

Reading Challenges: TBR Challenge hosted by Roof Beam Reader

I really enjoyed this. I liked the politics – which seemed as apt as when Heinlein wrote it – and the style. The plot is generally quite exciting and for the most part, it moved quite quickly. It does get a bit gummed up in the middle when there are long political interludes during the setting up of the rebel group but by the end, the pace had picked up again.

The novel is written from Mannie’s point of view. His first person narrative is written in pidgin English with words taken from Russian and from Australian slang, for example and using a simplified grammar system. He is suitably cynical and generally easy with working outside of the law. He is the first one to realise that the main computer – which he christens Mike (short for Mycroft Holmes) – is self-aware and trying to make a joke when he attempts to send out a pay check for a ridiculous amount of money. The two quickly become friends and Mannie attempts to teach Mike what humour actually looks like.

Mannie attends a political meeting where he meets Wyoh, a visiting political activist. When the meeting ends in a riot, Mannie hides Wyoh and introduces her, and his mentor, Professor de la Paz to Mike. They begin to discuss the likelihood of rebelling and as Mike is able to calculate the odds of a number of scenarios, they are able to work out there best odds of succeeding.

Mike is an interesting character. He is like a cross between a walking encyclopaedia and a somewhat annoying child. He is able to develop a voice for himself and an image so that he can be the leader of the group – named Adam Selene. He also has a rebellious alter ego called Simon Jester who creates political slogans which are quickly taken up by the populace. It was interesting that I quickly forgot that Mike was a mere machine. There were times when I worried that Mike was not trustworthy – a strange thought to have about a machine – like, for example, when he reveals he has used Mannie’s voice to give orders or when I remembered that he was so interested in what a successful joke might look like.

The final chapter details the war between the Federated Nations and Luna. It is a welcom relief from the political talk and posturing of the previous chapter as there is plenty of action. Even so, the ending felt anticlimactic. Although they win their freedom, the new government soon falls within predictable lines. Disappointingly, Mike is taken offline during the bombardment and cannot be found. Mannie is distraught by this and mourns Mike as he mourns Prof (who dies of heart failure as soon as Luna’s freedom is secured). It is disappointing but maybe that is the way of revolutions.

TBR 10 Yr – Munich – Robert Harris

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 2023Leave a comment

Genre: Historical Fiction, Espionage

Narrative Style: Third person with viewpoint alternating between two characters. Chronological.

Rating: 4/5

Published: 2017

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: Hitler is determined to start a war and Chamberlain is determined to stop him. Hugh Legat works as one of the prime minister’s private secretaries. His old friend, Paul Hartman is a German diplomat. They haven’t seen each other since 1932. Now there paths are destined to cross in Munich when both leaders arrive in the city to try and reach a historic agreement.

Reading Challenge: TBR Challenge 2023

Time on Shelf: I bought this not long after it came out. I really enjoyed Fatherland and was keen to read more by Harris.

There were a couple of things that attracted me to this book. First of all, it was about a time in history that I hadn’t read much about. Books about world war two tend to focus on later events and on Winston Churchill. Secondly, I was keen to read a straightforward historical novel from Harris after reading Fatherland. Finally, I have mixed feelings about spy fiction but felt that if anyone could do it well, it would be Harris.

The book is set in September 1938. Hitler is threatening to invade Czechoslovakia. He wants possession of the parts of the country that are settled largely by Germans and war will be the result if he doesn’t get them. Chamberlain, along with other leaders are tasked with resolving this. We see the story unfold from the point of view of Legat, first of all and then from the German side, from that of Paul Hartman, both of whom are closely involved with the events.

Legat begins the novel an ordinary civil servant with a unhappy marriage. He is an ordinary man in an extraordinary position. The first thing that happens to him is he attends a meeting between Chamberlain and the heads of the armed forces in which he learns that the Navy are not yet ready for war as they were not expecting this situation to arrive so soon. Immediately after, he is told to destroy his notes, something he finds quite shocking. How close this is to the truth I am unsure but it certainly gives a different slant to the events that follow.

By contrast, Paul Hartmann is confident, almost arrogant. He had initially supported the new regime and so has a position within the foreign office. He is now beginning to feel uneasy with the regime and is part of an underground group that are planning to get rid of Hitler. Their plot involves the army and requires a war to be started. When some material comes into his hands that shows that Hitler is lying when he says that he has no further territorial ambitions and he will not invade anywhere if he gets the Sudetenland, he thinks of his old college friend and sends it to Legat.

At first, the narrative moves between Legat and Hartman in alternate chapters, helping to make the story tense. Of course, we know how the conference between Hitler and Chamberlain turns out but it is still interesting to see the machinations of both governments as they move towards it. As the story progresses and both Legat and Hartman are in Munich, the story switches between their viewpoints more quickly and it is possible to sense the frustration of both men at their own powerlessness in the grand scheme of things.

The characterisation of Chamberlain was interesting. The popular view of him is that he capitulated to Hitler because he was a coward and if not for Churchill we’d all be speaking German now. Harris paints him as an honourable man who is passionately opposed to war at this point in time. He knows his armed forces aren’t ready and he feels that the country will not back him if they went to war over this issue. While it is easy for us to see that the note he comes back with is ridiculous and that Hitler will break his promise, it is also possible to see the honest hope that Chamberlain has in this act.

I did enjoy this book and it is certainly one of the best spy novels I have read, I did feel that these stories always seem to turn on people’s stupidity (for example, Legat leaves secret documents in his room which is then burgled) and also on exceptional good luck. (Legat doesn’t actually lose the documents. Chamberlain’s secretary gets them just in time.) Also, the characters of Legat and Hartman sometimes seemed a little clichéd but overall, it kept me reading and made me think differently about the Munich agreement.

TBR YR 10 – 2. The Man in the Red Coat – Julian Barnes

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 2023Leave a comment

Genre: Biography, History

Narrative Style: Third person

Published: 2019

Rating 5/5

Format: Hardback

Synopsis: Barnes’ biography of Samuel Pozzi begins with a trip to London by three men – a count, a prince and a commoner – the commoner being Pozzi – and expands to take in the Parisian Belle Epoque. Pozzi is the man in the red coat – one of John Singer Sargent’s greatest portraits. Whilst describing the life of Pozzi, Barnes discusses the ideas of the era and describes some of its liveliest characters including Oscar Wilde and Sarah Bernhardt.

Time on shelf: Not sure why this one lingered for so long. I’m a big fan of Julian Barnes and usually read his books quite quickly after purchase.

Reading challenges: TBR Challenge hosted by Adam at Roof Beam Reader.

This was a joy from start to finish. Barnes has an easy style – like having a fireside chat with a friendly history professor. He describes the life of Samuel Pozzi in the main, but also the other two men who arrive in London with him – Count Robert de Montesquiou and Prince Edmund De Polignac. This is a jumping off point for a wider discussion of the times which takes in duelling, dandys, the Dreyfus affair and the trial of Oscar Wilde. The supporting cast of characters includes Wilde, Sarah Bernhardt, Jean Lorrain and Joris-Karl Huysmans, all of whom are colourful to have been the subjects of this book.

Pozzi is an interesting character. He is an excellent surgeon who transformed working practises and made several operations safer. He was a gynocologist of some renown although he was also known for having affairs with his patients. He was married but had many affairs. He became rich and moved in the same circles as princes and counts. He treated Sarah Bernhardt who called him Dr God.

As A History of the World in 10 and a 1/2 Chapters takes the idea of the novel to the very limits, this explores the limitations of historical biographies. Often, Barnes explains, we cannot know exactly what happened. We are relying on others telling the truth and not being vindictive. We have to have a wider understanding of the age. Barnes writes this almost like a novel, wandering along the timeline and back again. There are recurring motifs such as that of bullets and duelling. At one point, Barnes says if this was a novel we would know this information because the author would make it so but as it is, we cannot know.

Overall, this was enjoyable and informative. Barnes has a clear love for his subject. (He is a renowned Francophile.) He has done a lot of research and the era and characters come alive for the reader. Thoroughly recommended.

TBRYear 10 – 1. The Children of Men by P. D. James

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 2023, Updates and informationLeave a comment

Genre: Dystopia

Narrative style: Chronological, shifts between first and third person.

Rating: 2/5

Published: 1992

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: Babies are no longer being born anywhere around the world. This has been so for over 20 years. Theo Faron is merely getting through his days with no hope for the future – either his own or that of civilisation. Then he meets Julian who is part of an activist group. Theo is immediately attracted to her and agrees – against his better judgement – to help the group out.

Time on shelf: I’ve wanted to read this for a long time. I bought this copy about three or four years ago but I kept overlooking it.

Reading challenges: TBR Challenge

I really wanted to enjoy this. I’m a big fan of dystopias (The Handmaid’s Tale, 1984 and Brave New World are some of my favourite books) but I couldn’t get to grips with this one. It’s a shame as James clearly had some interesting things to say about power and its abuses. The things she describes happening are apt and I could imagine that would be how things would go if such a dreadful thing were to occur. Unfortunately the plot and characterisation didn’t live up to that promise.

My first problem was with Theo’s first person narration – written as diary entries. I know that he was a historian and also bored with his existence but did his voice have to be so dull and plodding? He is also an unpleasant person with barely a thought for anyone else. He accidentally ran over and killed his daughter but shows little feeling for the child or for her mother when she is grieving. Don’t get me wrong, I love a less than perfect hero as much as the next person but Theo was almost impossible to like. There was no way to root for him.

James switches from Theo’s diary entries to third person narration from Theo’s point of view every couple of chapters. I wasn’t really sure why she used this device as it didn’t allow the reader access to anyone else’s thoughts. It did at least save the reader from the tedium of Theo’s first person voice. About halfway through the novel, Theo throws away his diary and the novel from then on is in third person. Fair enough but there were third person chapters before that happened.

The plot is very slow moving. It feels like a long time before anything happens. Even once Theo has met Julian, things don’t speed up. He agrees to help her and the other members of the ‘five fishes’ group after seeing the horror of a ‘quietus’ – the government’s way of dealing with the immense number of elderly people – where the elderly are expected to ‘voluntarily’ commit suicide when they reach a certain age. (This was one of the better parts of the book. Theo is forced to think for himself and to realise that the Government are actually not as good as he thought.) This is further brought home to him when he naively goes to visit Xan, the Warden of England, who also happens to be his cousin and finds he cannot persuade him to change any of his ideals.

I felt that James could have picked any issue to write this dystopia. While there are details of women christening their pets or pushing around dolls in prams because the focus is on Theo (who didn’t even love the child he had) we don’t see much of the emotion of the situation. There is no longing for a younger generation from him. He is only concerned for himself. At the end of the novel, Theo shoots the Warden and takes the ring that symbolises his power. It seems that he will be the next leader of England – especially as he can now introduce the first baby born since 1995 to the world. Given Theo’s lack of feeling for others, it is doubtful he will make a better leader than Xan. The novel ends with him baptising the new baby suggesting his new sense of power and Julian (the baby’s mother) can only look on, pushed aside as surely as she would have been if Xan had still been in charge. James makes a strong point about power and the way men push women aside even when they are needed for the most important job in the world. I just wish that the story that brought us to this point have been better.

Books Read in 2022 – 30. The Princess Bride – William Goldman

On By kepagewriterIn Book Reviews, TBR Challenge 2022Leave a comment

Genre: fantasy, children’s literature, adventure

Narrative Style: Third person, chronological with interruptions from the author.

Published: 1973

Rating: 3/5

Synopsis: This is the story of Buttercup, the most beautiful girl in the world and the ups and downs of her romance with Westley. It is also the story of Goldman abridging the tale (written by S. Morgenstern) he heard his father tell him as a boy. This leads to intrusions and asides from the author.

Time on shelf: A couple of years. I haven’t seen the film but a few of my friends really like it so I thought I’d read the book first.

Reading Challenges: TBR Reading Challenge 2022

This was a lot stranger than I thought it was going to be. I was expecting a straightforward adventure romp – and, of course, it is a romp, – but it is anything but straightforward. Goldman claims that the he didn’t write the book but is merely abridging it so that it is as good as when his father read it to him when he was a boy. He is keen to make sure we skip the boring bits.

I really enjoyed aspects of this book. I loved Inigo’s storyline and character. He was definitely my favourite and his sword fight with the man in black was one of the best moments of the book. I also enjoyed Fezzik’s rhyming and the way it was used throughout the narrative. There were some real moments of magic.

Unfortunately, they couldn’t quite overcome my irritation. Westley and Buttercup annoyed me no end. Especially Buttercup. The interruptions of the ‘author’s voice’ broke up the narrative in a way I found irritating. Finally, the ending left me feeling non-plussed. Overall, it was a very odd reading experience.

That said, I can see that this would make a great film so I will definitely be making an effort to see it in the future,

Books Read in 2022 – 21. Girl, Woman, Other – Bernardine Evaristo

On By kepagewriterIn Book ReviewsLeave a comment

Genre: LGBT, Feminism, Race

Narrative Style: Third person from the perspective of 12 different, interconnected characters

Rating: 4/5

Published: 2019

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: Girl, Woman, Other describes the lives of 12 women, all of whom are linked in someway to Amma, a theatre director whose play ‘The Last Amazon of Dahomie’ is premiering at the National Theatre.

Time on shelf: I bought this not long after it won the Booker Prize.

At first, I wasn’t sure if I was going to like this book. Amma, the first character we meet, is quite politically driven and I was worried that the polemic might overrule the charactersiation. However, overall, this is not the case. Evaristo gives different political points of view, for a start, and her characters are all more than just their views and opinions.

I also wasn’t sure if I would get used to the style with its lack of punctuation but actually I got used to the free flowing poetic prose very quickly and it definitely suited the voices and lives that Evaristo has chosen to show us. It was easy to read whilst also being emotional and affecting.

The range of characters is interesting and shows the depth and range of black women’s lives. For example, after Amma, we meet her daughter, Yazz and her university friends. We meet Carole who abandons her cultural identity to become a successful business woman, her mother, Bummi and her teacher, Shirley, as well as another teacher in the school, Penelope who is raised white by her adoptive parents. The stories stretch across the centuries and continents.

I did find it a bit dizzying at times, remembering how everyone related to each other. Also, inevitably there were some characters I would have liked to have known for longer. You would read one character, start to get used to their foibles and idiosyncrasies and it would be on to the the next one. Similar to reading Tales of the City, there were times when I wished there were fewer people to deal with.

Despite that, this is a very good read. There were moments when I felt the politics were more polemic but they were few and far between. Sometimes the characters – particularly the men- felt a little stereotypical but for the most part, I was involved and I was keen to read on. Would definitely recommend.