TBR 10 Yr – You Before Me – Jojo Moyes

Genre: Chick lit, romance, disability

Narrative Style: First person from a number of different people, chronological

Rating: 2/5

Published: 2012

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: Louisa Clark is in need of a new job. The job centre sends her to be carer to quadriplegic, Will Traynor. Will is rude and miserable and at first refuses to acknowledge Louisa. She hates it but perseveres and soon, Will’s happiness begins to mean a lot to her. Then she discovers that Will has given his parents six months before he goes to Dignitas and ends his life and she tries many schemes to make him change his mind.

Reading Challenges: TBR 10 Yr Challenge hosted by Roof Beam Reader

Time on shelf: I bought this when the film came out. It was 99p on Kindle so I bought it but very quickly I decided I probably wouldn’t like it so it sat on the shelf.

I don’t know why I do it to myself. Whenever there is a book that is really popular and I decide to read it, I always hate it. (Where the Crawdads Sing, The Thursday Murder Club, The Time Traveller’s Wife to name but three.) I put off reading this for that very reason, not to mention that when the film came out, disability activists were up in arms. I wasn’t sure I wanted to ever read it. Putting it on this list meant that I had to read it.

It didn’t take long for me to be irritated. The characters were immediately stereotypical. Lou Clark was a quirky, working class heroine. Will was upper class, used to having his own way and sullen because he felt he was no longer in control of his life. I found the stereotyping offensive even without the disability angle. (Salt of the earth, working class heroine reminds buttoned up upper class hero what it means to love. How tedious.) Lou’s family seem to have stepped out of a dickens novel about poverty – sister Treena is a single mom, dad makes furniture and gets laid off halfway through( but luckily is saved by Will and given a job working for his dad!), mum spends all her time looking after Lou’s grandfather who has had a stroke. They all live in the same house and there is never enough money to go round. All of them seemed like “characters” rather than actual people.

I was also unconvinced by Lou’s relationship with her boyfriend, Patrick – a man obsessed with running and training and eating the right thing. Although Lou says that he was different when they first got together, it was very difficult to see how they had managed to have a relationship last for seven years. I certainly didn’t see why Lou still put up with him. He was unpleasant and only seemed to see a version of Lou that he would prefer – one that would train with him, for example. Lou, then, was ripe for falling in love and Will came into the picture at just the right time.

Of course, at first Will is singularly unpleasant and Lou wants to quit but money troubles mean that she can’t. Slowly, Will becomes more communicative especially after a visit from his ex girlfriend Alicia who is getting married to his best friend Rupert, both of whom are horrible. Then Louisa hears Mrs Traynor and Will’s sister, Georgina, talking about the fact that they had six months to convince Will he wanted to live. If they couldn’t do it, then he would end his life at Dignitas in Switzerland. Lou finds this hard to understand and so she decides that she will try to make the future as exciting as possible for Will as she feels that he should want to live, that she can make things more exciting for him and if she just tries hard enough, he will realise that actually life is good. It seemed obvious to me that Will would not change his mind.

I feel like there is no good way to end this narrative. First of all, there is the way it actually ends. Will, despite the fact that he loves Louisa, still goes to Switzerland. This is what angered the disability rights groups so much. Will has the money to pay for whatever he needs. He could live a reasonable life. He has people who love him. But still, he decides to kill himself. I understand that people could see this as meaning disabled people have no role in society but I do not think that this is what Moyes intended to say. In fact, I think that Will’s decision had more to do with the fact that he is unused to having to take anything into account when he decides to do something. Before his accident, he had money and he travelled extensively. He hiked and climbed mountains. After the accident, he has to think about his disability all the time and if it doesn’t stop him from doing something, it puts huge obstacles in the way. Louisa (and her mother) fail to understand this because they have to think carefully about every decision they make because they have no money and no spare time. Also, everyone, apart from Will, opposes the idea of going to Dignitas There are many moral arguments given against this decision in the novel. If Moyes’ felt that disabled people have no meaning within society, I think she may have chosen to play this a little differently.

So what about a different ending? I feel, although all those readers who say they cried may feel differently, that if Will had changed his mind, it would have been no better. In fact, as I neared the end of the novel, I was unsure what to wish for. I didn’t particularly want Will to kill himself but I was also offended by the idea that the love of a quirky working class girl might be enough to save the day. Neither Louisa nor her mother really think about what Will is going through. They think about the fact that they will miss him and they call him selfish for all the hurt that he will cause but they do not think about what he might feel, when he has yet another bout of pneumonia or when he gets an infection he can’t shake off. It seemed to me that Will wanted to have control over his death, to have a good death and be able to say goodbye to people. A fair enough wish, I would think.

Finally, I found the class politics of this novel annoying. Pre-accident, Will has money, a job in the city and is able to travel all over the world. Lou, by contrast, is working in a café enjoying the eccentricities of the customers. Their paths would not have crossed of not for Will’s accident. That’s one hell of a plot device. And then there is the fact that Will leaves her a lot of money so she can go to university and live a life she would not have managed otherwise. Suitable compensation for not having his company? I certainly didn’t feel it was the romantic ending that everyone else seemed to. Ultimately, she learns to be a better person through her contact with Will and then she gets to live a better life through the money he leaves her. Both of these left a sour taste in my mouth.

TBR Yr 10 – 6. The Golem and the Djinni – Helene Wecker

Genre: Magic realism, historical fiction

Narrative Style: third person from various viewpoints

Published: 2013

Format: Kindle

Rating: 5/5

Synopsis: Chava is a golem, made to obey, whose master dies before he has a chance to issue any instructions. Ahmad is a djinni, born into the Syrian desert and trapped in a lamp by a wizard. Both of them find themselves in New York at the start of the twentieth century.

Reading challenges: TBR challenge Yr 10 – Hosted by Adam Burgess at Roof Beam Reader

Time on shelf: A few years. I bought it because I’m interested in the idea of golems but I put off reading it because it seemed rather long for a what I assumed was essentially a fairy tale.

There are fairy tale elements to this book but I soon discovered it was so much more. The 400+ pages flashed by as I could not put it down. In fact, if I could have gone on reading I would. (I know now there is a sequel so I will be purchasing that soon.)

Chava is created by a disgraced rabbi, back in Poland, as a wife for a rather unpleasant man. He plans to take her to the new world but on the ship across he dies from a burst appendix. Chava is left with no master. As a creature that is made to obey, she struggles to exist without instruction. Even worse, she can hear the desires of everyone she meets and longs to be able to help them all. She knows, however, that to do so would reveal her true nature and put her in great danger.

Ahmad is djinni, trapped in a copper flask by a powerful wizard, who is accidentally released by tinsmith Arbeely when he tries to clean the flask in order to repair it. Ahmad is a creature of fire and struggles to acclimatise in New York’s weather. Arbeely, gives him a job and he soon becomes famous, due to the amazing creations he produces. He is able to melt the metal with his bare hands.

Inevitably, these two supernatural creatures find each other and begin an unlikely friendship as they try to understand the alien world of New York in the early twentieth century. It transpires that their fates are linked as the golem’s creator, Yehuda Schaalman, decides to follow his creation to New York once he realises that she is owner free. As he gets closer to her, it becomes apparent that he also had a hand in Ahmad’s imprisonment in the flask. Will they be able to stand together and defeat this evil that has come into their lives?

So, these are the fairy tale elements of Wecker’s book but this is also a story about the difficulty of the immigrant experience. Both Chava and Ahmad feel alienated and don’t understand the way others behave. They have difficulty fitting in and they don’t understand the rules of polite society. Not only that, but Wecker shows the long hours worked (particularly by Chava in the bakery where she works) and the poverty (in describing the sheltering house for newly arrived Jewish immigrants). The loneliness of the golem and djinni are representative of the loneliness of the immigrant experience, as is their journey from the old world to the new.

Ultimately, this is a book about the human condition and the way society makes life difficult for those who are different. It is heartwarming and exciting in equal measure. As I said earlier, I could definitely have carried on reading and although the book comes to a conclusion, it did not feel like the complete end of the story. So I am glad there is a sequel and I am able to know more of their story.

TBR Challenge – Books Read in 2022 – 27. Have You Eaten Grandma? – Gyles Brandreth

Genre: grammar, the English language

Narrative Style: first person, informal

Published: 2018

Rating: 4/5

Format: Hardback

Synopsis: Gyles Brandreth does not like grammar and punctuation mistakes. In this book, he takes on the linguistic horrors of our times. He explains, offers advice and discusses the importance of language and using it well.

Reading Challenges: TBR Challenge 2022

Time on Shelf: I bought this in 2018, not long after it came out.

I love a book about grammar and language usage. It really brings out the English teacher in me. I like the preciseness of it, discussing exact usage and reminding myself of the rules.

Of course, this being Brandreth, this isn’t just a user’s guide to the English language, it’s packed with little asides and amusing anecdotes – all told in his trademark style. This is not a dry language guide. When he is talking about colons, he compares them to binoculars because the colon helps you look ahead. This is a very straightforward way of explaining the colon’s usage. Much easier than a technical explanation.

There is a lot of silliness and some name-dropping, of course. He mentions that the Queen’s comfort breaks are scheduled as ‘opportunity to tidy’ which is quite marvellous. He is also surprisingly modern. For all his Conservative MP status, he is not a stick in the mud language must not change type. He seems to find some joy in online abbreviations and encourages people to look to rappers as well as Jane Austen.

I really enjoyed this book but it’s appeal is probably a bit niche. For all its humour, I imagine most people don’t give much thought to misplaced apostrophes or to why ‘Can I get’ is so annoying and so would probably balk at reading an entire book of grammar advice. Given the amount of badly written PowerPoints I have to sit through in meetings and training, this seems a shame.

Books Read in 2022 – 21. Girl, Woman, Other – Bernardine Evaristo

Genre: LGBT, Feminism, Race

Narrative Style: Third person from the perspective of 12 different, interconnected characters

Rating: 4/5

Published: 2019

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: Girl, Woman, Other describes the lives of 12 women, all of whom are linked in someway to Amma, a theatre director whose play ‘The Last Amazon of Dahomie’ is premiering at the National Theatre.

Time on shelf: I bought this not long after it won the Booker Prize.

At first, I wasn’t sure if I was going to like this book. Amma, the first character we meet, is quite politically driven and I was worried that the polemic might overrule the charactersiation. However, overall, this is not the case. Evaristo gives different political points of view, for a start, and her characters are all more than just their views and opinions.

I also wasn’t sure if I would get used to the style with its lack of punctuation but actually I got used to the free flowing poetic prose very quickly and it definitely suited the voices and lives that Evaristo has chosen to show us. It was easy to read whilst also being emotional and affecting.

The range of characters is interesting and shows the depth and range of black women’s lives. For example, after Amma, we meet her daughter, Yazz and her university friends. We meet Carole who abandons her cultural identity to become a successful business woman, her mother, Bummi and her teacher, Shirley, as well as another teacher in the school, Penelope who is raised white by her adoptive parents. The stories stretch across the centuries and continents.

I did find it a bit dizzying at times, remembering how everyone related to each other. Also, inevitably there were some characters I would have liked to have known for longer. You would read one character, start to get used to their foibles and idiosyncrasies and it would be on to the the next one. Similar to reading Tales of the City, there were times when I wished there were fewer people to deal with.

Despite that, this is a very good read. There were moments when I felt the politics were more polemic but they were few and far between. Sometimes the characters – particularly the men- felt a little stereotypical but for the most part, I was involved and I was keen to read on. Would definitely recommend.

TBR Challenge 2022 – Books Read in 2002 – 20. More Tales of the City – Armistead Maupin

Genre: LGBT, Humour

Narrative Style: Third person from a number of different viewpoints.

Rating: 4/5

Published: 1978

Format: Paperback

Synopsis: The further adventures of Michael Tolliver, Mona Ramsey, Mary Ann Singleton and Anna Madrigal.

Book challenge: TBR Challenge 2022

Time on shelf: I’m not actually sure where this book came from – I don’t remember buying it – but it has been on the shelf for about 6 years.

I was pleased that I reread the first book before reading this as there are a lot of strands that carry on in this book and I definitely wouldn’t have remembered them otherwise. I was keen to read on and I have to say I was not disappointed.

I don’t know if I was just used to the style but I enjoyed this more than the first book. The characters felt more developed (which may just be because it takes a while to develop a character when you are writing such short chapters) and the various strands felt more interconnected. Even Mary Ann stopped annoying me as much.

Maupin is a master of plotting – dropping hints and clues to future events, keeping the reader on tenterhooks. That, along with the short chapters, kept me reading. In fact, a couple of times I almost made myself late by work by reading just another chapter before I left the house.

There are many things going on in this novel – romance, suspense, family reunions, illness, sex – but it never feels cluttered or clumsy. This may be because the landscape expands with Michael and Mary Ann on a cruise and Mona discovering new family in a desert whorehouse. The novel ends with revelations but with plenty of reasons to carry on reading the series which I’m quite keen to do.

Books Read in 2022: 19. House of Glass: The Story and Secrets of a Twentieth Century Jewish Family.

Narrative Style: First person

Genre: Memoir, Biography, History

Rating: 5/5

Published: 2020

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: Long after Hadley Freeman’s grandmother, Sara, died, Freeman found a box of keepsakes and photos tucked away in her grandmother’s closet. The discovery led to Freeman on a quest to discover exactly what happened to her family during the war, something which her family did not talk about.

Time on shelf: Not long. I’m a big fan of Hadley Freeman’s column in The Guardian and I often agree with her opinions so I was looking forward to reading this and finding out more about the Jewish experience during the war.

Freeman begins this memoir with the moment she found her grandmother’s box of keepsakes. She then describes the road that led her to look in her grandmother’s closet in the first place. This road starts with the description of a holiday to France to meet some of her father’s family as a five year old. Freeman was nervous of her paternal grandparents who always seemed to be bickering and she found her grandmother difficult as she always seemed so sad. She had similar difficulties with the old people she met on the holiday in France. Only two of them could speak English and Freeman felt too shy to speak to any of them. She was initially pleased when she saw her grandmother but she kept herself apart from her siblings, crying quietly to herself. Growing up, Freeman had no idea what might be causing her Grandmother’s depression and her parents didn’t explain. As a result, Freeman never became really close to her grandmother and had little information about her and her siblings. Even so, she decided that she wanted to try and write about her grandmother which is what led her to her grandmother’s closet.

Freeman begins the story of the Glass – then Glahs – family in the early 1900s in Chrzanow, an Eastern European Shtetl where Sara was born Sala, along with her siblings, Alex (born Sender), Henri (Jehuda) and Jacques (Jakob). No one talked about their childhood and Freeman turned to historical documents to try and find out some details about their lives. Lucky for Freeman, her Uncle Rich found a memoir written by Alex. He describes a hard early life. The family were poor and their father had very little luck with employment and health. Then came bigger problems as the Polish started to reject the Jewish people within their country and the Glahs family changed their surname to Glass, the first of many changes they would have to make in order to survive.

Freeman follows the siblings when they escape Poland to France, changing their first names now to sound more French. Each tried, with varying levels of success to make a new life for themselves. Sara suffered from ill health and spent time in a sanatorium but despite this she loved living in Paris, having a great interest in fashion and art. She would always keep this love of French style and Freeman mentions that she always seemed completely French rather than Polish. Unfortunately for her, she was not able to stay in the country she so loved.

I was aware of anti-Semitism in Poland and whilst the Glass family’s experiences there were upsetting, they were unsurprising. I had very little knowledge of life in Vichy France and the consequences for France’s Jewish population and was shocked by the lengths that the Vichy government went to, going further than the Nazis commanded them to. The Glass family loved France and were quite settled by the time that the Nazis invaded and the government started to remove their Jewish citizens. It is hard to imagine what it would feel like when the country you had adopted as your home and which had accepted you suddenly turned on them in such a horrible way. They had already been through the Pogroms in Poland and now here they were again, facing the same horrible problem.

They react in a variety of ways. In fact, Freeman suggests that between them, they represented the various paths that European Jews took during this time. Sara is forced to marry an American that she does not love and who takes her to the States where she will be safe. Jacques refused to believe that his adopted country would hurt him, registered as Jewish and consequently was taken to a concentration camp. By contrast, Henri assimilated and managed to survive the war in Paris. Finally, Alex was likely involved in the resistance and was able to survive due to his pragmatic nature.

They are vividly painted before, during and after the war. I quickly became attached to each of them – heartbroken when Jacques and his wife died in a concentration camp and when Sara is forced to leave the love of her life in France when she goes to America; hopeful and then relieved when Alex and Henri survive the war. Freeman doesn’t stop with the end of the war but carries on their stories until their deaths later in the century. This made it a more hopeful narrative and one that gave more than one version of the Jewish experience. I couldn’t put it down.

Books Read in 2022 – 18. Tales of the City – Armistead Maupin

Genre: LGBT, Humour

Narrative Style: Short, third person vignettes from multiple points of view

Rating: 4/5

Published: 1978

Format: Paperback

Synopsis: Mary Ann Singleton has just moved to San Francisco. She is naïve, fresh out of Cleveland when she moves into 28 Barbary Lane run by eccentric landlady, Anna Madrigal. She soon becomes friends with other tenants, Mona, Brian and Michael.

Time on Shelf: I bought this while I was at university so 25+ years ago. I read it not longer after buying it. I decided to re-read it as I’m reading More Tales of the City for the TBR Challenge and I couldn’t remember much about it.

This was a lot more enjoyable than I remembered. Although I didn’t really remember the content, I did remember that I’d been a little disappointed when I read it – disappointed enough to not carry on reading the series, anyway. Probably because I read it on the back of Holleran’s Dancer from the Dance and Bartlett’s Ready to Catch Him Should He Fall and was perhaps expecting something similar. Maupin’s novel is something different. For a start, it isn’t an exclusively gay tale. Maupin’s characters are gay, straight and trans although in the first novel, it seems that the straight characters get more page time than the others. Of course, I didn’t realise that Maupin’s novel had been serialised in the San Francisco Chronicle and Maupin felt that he couldn’t incorporate gay characters until the column had a solid following. One of his editors kept a character chart to ensure that the gay characters didn’t get more page time than the hetero ones. That would explain why the main gay character, Michael is such a fleeting presence in the first novel, compared to Mary Ann, for example.

This was a source of disappointment on first reading. However, I must say that I felt differently this time round and it was good to read a novel where the straight and gay characters live together in perfect harmony. Any prejudice tends to come from outside of their community.

I admit, I found Mary Ann a little annoying on both times of reading. She is uptight and prudish, She claims to want a new start in San Francisco but finds it impossible to let go and completely relax. It is hard to understand why Michael is so keen to be her friend. I did enjoy Michael’s romance with the handsome gynecologist, Jon who he wishes to settle down with. I was sad when it finished when Jon sees Michael in an underwear dance contest.

At the end, I felt glad that I had already planned to read on. I felt that there was more to be learned about the characters and that their tales were not over. Maupin sows the seeds of a lot of stories that have yet to flower. I’m looking forward to the next instalment.

TBR Challenge – Books Read in 2022 – 16. The Long Call – Ann Cleeves

Genre: Detective, LGBT

Narrative Style: Third person from a number of viewpoints

Rating: 3/5

Published: 2019

Format: Paperback

Synopsis: Detective Matthew Venn has built a successful career for himself. He is happily married and starting to be more comfortable with his sexuality. He was brought up in a religious cult that did not approve of his sexuality so he has nothing to do with them. When first, his father dies and later, a case takes him back into the evangelical community, he has to face his mother and his past again.

Time on shelf: I bought this not long after it came out but didn’t get round to reading it. Then I accidentally watched the TV series. I usually like to read the book first so I wanted to leave the book until the TV series wasn’t fresh in my mind.

Reading challenges: TBR Challenge

The Long Call is the start of a new series. I had really enjoyed Cleeves’ Shetland series so I was hoping that this might be the start of a long relationship with Matthew Venn and his colleagues. However, although I enjoyed the plot, I found a lot of the characters a bit flat.

Matthew himself is quite well drawn. He is angry and finds personal relationships difficult. He is less gregarious than his husband, Jonathan and keeps himself to himself. When a man with an albatross on his neck is found dead on the beach, Matthew finds himself at the centre of his first murder case. It was easy empathise with Matthew when he finds the case takes him back into his past and he has to meet with his mother and Dennis, a pastor in the church. It is clear that he finds this difficult and he is often filled with self doubt.

However, I didn’t find the rest of the characters so convincing. DI Jen Raffety was a single mother with an abusive husband in her past who doesn’t trust her colleague, Ross who is arrogant and ambitious. There is Gaby, an artist who is full of secrets and Caroline, religious and rich with a father who feels he has a lot to make up for. They aren’t anymore fleshed out than this. The same goes for members of the church like Dennis and Matthew’s mother.

The plot is more interesting and I did think it was a shame that I had watched it already because Cleeves does set each discovery up well. I don’t think I would have been able to work it out if I hadn’t been able to remember the TV programme. Cleeves touches on domestic abuse, sexual abuse of vulnerable women and the way those in power cover things up whilst also focusing on Matthew’s difficulties in coming to terms with his past. All of which was interesting and compelling.

I’m not sure whether I will read the next books in this series. Whilst I did like Matthew and would be interested in his future, the rest of the characters didn’t appeal at all and I didn’t enjoy the location as much as in the Shetland books but I would consider it.

TBR Challenge – Books Read in 2022 – 15. Homage to Catalonia – George Orwell

Genre: History, politics, war

Narrative style: first person

Rating: 4/5

Published: 1938

Format: Kindle

Synopsis: In 1936, George Orwell travelled to Spain to report on the civil war. Instead, he joined the fight against the fascists. Homage to Catalonia is his account of the fighting.

Time on Shelf: About 3 years. I downloaded this to my kindle because I was keen to read some of Orwell’s non-fiction (I also bought The Road to Wigan Pier). But then I didn’t read either of them.

Reading challenges: TBR Challenge 2022

Homage to Catalonia is Orwell’s personal account of fighting for the POUM militia in 1937. Orwell describes the revolutionary fervour that had taken over Catalonia when he is training for the front. There is a constant shortage of weapons and it is hard to understand how the war is being fought under such circumstances.

He then moves to his experiences in the field in the mountains outside of Barcelona. He doesn’t see much fighting and he describes the mundaneness of hanging around waiting for something to happen. Everything is in short supply. There is very little firewood so they are freezing. As well as food shortages, there is little tobacco – something which really troubles Orwell. Also, should fighting start, they were low on munitions. Again, it was difficult to see how they could fight under these conditions.

Orwell’s tone throughout is one of a proper Englishman. Even when he is shot in the throat, he is stoic and very much a representation of the stiff upper lip. He is also passionately anti-fascist. It is easy to see how Animal Farm and 1984 could have come from his imagination.

It was a little confusing keeping track of all the different elements that are fighting, not only against the fascists but with each other. There were communists, anarchists, and Trotskyists. Orwell carefully details the differences between them and who was allied with who but I admit that it was hard to remember who was who and I spent a lot of time reminding myself of who was who.

Overall, this was a worthwhile read. It gave a snapshot about one part of the Spanish Civil War but I will need to read more to get a full picture of the fighting.

Books Read in 2022 – 14. Shuggie Bain – Douglas Stuart

Genre: bildungsroman, lgbt, family

Narrative Style: third person – flashback framed by Shuggie’s current life.

Rating: 5/5

Published: 2020

Format: Paperback

Synopsis: Hugh “Shuggie” Bain loves his mother, Agnes, very much. He will do anything for her. Unfortunately, Agness is an alcoholic and is not able to look after Shuggie the way she should. The novel describes Shuggie’s life, growing up in 1980s Glasgow on run down estates, sometimes going to school, sometimes not. Shuggie is a quiet, sensitive boy who struggles to fit in. His older siblings manage to escape from Agnes but Shuggie is stuck, unable to leave and unable to save her.

Time on shelf: I bought this with birthday money, last year, so not very long.

This is not an easy read. Shuggie, his siblings and their mother, Agnes are living in Glasgow, in the 1980s and they have no money and few prospects. Life is tough. Agnes is an alcoholic who can’t look after her children. Shuggie’s father is a tough, cruel man. Agnes’ life with him was a series of sexual assaults, violence and betrayals that fuel her drinking. Later, he moves in with another woman, only appearing to make sure that Agnes remains in thrall to him.

Shuggie is a quiet and sensitive child. He cuts out picutres of women from Agnes’ Freemans catalogues, he has dolls that he carries around everywhere and he is no good at what might be considered traditionally masculine things. Everyone seems to be able to see what Shuggie cannot – that he is gay. This leads to bullying and abuse from other children and from adults. Shuggie tries to learn how to behave in a more masculine manner but he cannot hide who he really is.

Shuggie’s siblings, Catherine and Leek, are lucky to be able to escape the family home but Shuggie is tied to Agnes. He feels he cannot desert her. Heartbreakingly, Agnes has a brief interlude of sobriety and things look better for everyone. Shuggie gets to see what the world could be like. Unsurprising;y, it doesn’t last and everything is even worse because he had a taste of what could have been.

This may be a bleak book full of missed chances and shattered dreams but it is compelling. It is easy to empathise with Agnes and her inability to escape from her addiction, and even more so with her children. In the end, it is hard to say what the future will hold for Shuggie. The reader can only hope that he will break the cycle and his life will be better.